Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | draxil's commentslogin

Google wave rides again!

I'd say the thing with email that most improvements would need improved standards?

That said, as with the emacs user example, the ability to automatically process all your email in madly custom ways can now be opened to the masses.


Except it's often faster to make the change yourself than explain it to an AI.


I don't like that word, which was previously a common part of my vocabulary, being forever ruined?


My father's name was Claude, but, you know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


We need to get these companies to predeclare what names they're going to use for the next 50 or 60 years so we can avoid them.

Pouring one out for all the "Alexa"s in the world.


It is weird to me that Amazon chose a fairly common name. There are plenty of short, more unique names out there.

I have ours set to “Computer” anyways, partly due to Star Trek and partly because it annoys my wife when we use the term in conversation and it picks it up. It has the side effect of being harder to pronounce for our kids, which was probably a good thing.


I think the fact you need tool calling to stop it doing that, shows the underlying issue with trusting it to do anything without a human


Useful tool, and if you're just scratching a small itch it's great.

For any serious system you still need to understand and guide the code, and unless you do some of the coding.. You won't. It's just novelty right now is skewing our reasoning.


It’s still faster to use AI to generate code while reading and guiding the code. Hell even long before LLms I would write python scripts to generate boilerplate code etc. LLM can be used similarly as a productivity boost in serious systems.


This is a good parallel. In the 90s when I learned to drive I was quite good at navigating. Now google maps is on a screen in my car telling me where to go whenever I drive beyond my most common routes.

Really all the research telling us about AI skills atrophy.. We should have guessed from previous experience.


Old people my entire life have made fun of younger people for “not being able to read maps” or something.

But I’ve never seen anyone follow a GPS so religiously into so many obvious dead ends than elderly Uber drivers.


Good to have more than a hammer in your toolbox!


I assume you mean open weight models? I wish we had better open source models. It would make LLMs far less icky if we had nice clean open trained models. A breakthrough on the cost of training would be nice.


We really can't have open source LLM, because they are all based on the stolen IP, or stolen IP slightly laundered and under different title.


I feel like an opt-in model built on AGPL code should output AGPL code.

I'd put my work into that. Not the only option just an example.

Every great project takes time to build. It's possible.


Hmm...no. These two things are orthogonal. Regardless, Olmo are opensource.


Nemotron is genuinely open source at least at the smaller sizes. You can download the datasets.


Also everything from scratch by allen.ai.

Weights, datasets, code, multiple checkpoints...

I like their FlexOlmo concept.


Fair clarification, yes.


Check out Apertus, the publicly funded model from a research team that goes to great lengths to remove icky content.


I think Gemini might be wise to rename, now there's a commercial product trampling all over it's namespace.


However if it's supposed to continue being an indie protocol and fly under the radar, it's perfect


emacs users who are hostile to you configuring things, aren't really getting the point IMO :)


The list of things emacs users don't get seems to get longer per day so I'm not surprised at the reaction OP got, just disappointed

(but I still think this is on nginx more than emacs - unless they really mean foo~ and not .foo~ )


> The list of things emacs users don't get seems to get...

There are a ton of Emacs users, and it's doesn't make much sense to talk about them as a group like that, no more than if I were to say, "The list of things Windows users don't get..."


They are hostile to me proposing a better (IMO) default


It depends on what you mean by default and whose default.

You can change your own defaults quite easily!

Changing the default setup with emacs that has been shipping for > 30 years is tough.

Getting nginx to ignore a well established pattern by a well established editor seems equally sensible and perhaps more doable. Yes?


By default I mean whatever you get by doing `sudo apt-get install emacs-nox`

I disagree about "tough". Emacs has changed for the better in new releases quite drastically in the last years in my experience.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: