Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kodt's commentslogin

I wonder if making the game free to play before shut down would allow them to skirt the law?

I doubt it, as that'd not nullify the contract established by people who bought the game before it went FTP.

>(also if you're wondering, I don't think the boundary is along racial lines)

read the entire comment waiting for this


depends if you do a copy paste or cut and paste


My point is that the word "upload", without context indicating otherwise, does not imply that the original is changed in any way.


If you steal a book and read it, should you have to pay every time you use the knowledge gained or recall parts of it from memory?


No. People are not LLMs. And even if some argue that they are mechanically similar, they are legally distinct.


If I charged people for the privilege of listening to me recite relevant parts of the book to them for profit? Yes. Depending on the copyright.


So like a teacher?


What if you steal a CD and then play it on your radio station each morning?


Even better, what if you transform that stolen CD into an MP3, so the data isn’t the same as a lossy process was used, then share the MP3 with the world as your own work?

I don’t get why the training process doesn’t count as any other form of transformation but then I’m not a lawyer.


even better if it is a pirate radio station


If I perform a song in public then yes, I should pay the creator every time I play it. I fail to see the difference here.


What if you are performing your own song which was heavily influenced by other artists?

Also I believe performing covers is legal


Live bands are playing songs of known artists all the time, is that actually illegal?



For their mail service they did


The Matrix is an interesting one because it really caught on with the DVD release. So that was most peoples first exposure to it, not the theatrical release. Even if incorrect, if that was the first way you saw it, it is likely how you consider it "should" look.


It's a bit disingenuous to imply The Matrix did not catch on until DVD release. The Matrix broke several (minor) box office records, was critically hailed, and an awards darling for the below the line technical awards.

Having said all that. One of the most interesting aspects of conversations around the true version of films and such is that just because of the way time works the vast majority of people's first experience with any film will definitely NOT be a in a theater.


I didn't meant to say no-one saw it theatrically but I probably did undersell it there.

The DVD was such a huge seller and coincided with the format really catching on. The Matrix was the "must have" DVD to show off the format and for many was likely one of the first DVDs they ever purchased.

It was also the go-to movie to show off DivX rips.

The popularity of The Matrix is closely linked with a surge in DVD popularity. IIRC DVD player prices became more affordable right around 2000 which opened it up to more people.


Isn't lighting any fire in the woods during dry conditions inherently malicious?


A hot exhaust could cause a fire in the woods during dry conditions. Would you consider this malicious behavior if you idled your car to take a photo and something smoldered you didn't notice? Negligent perhaps, but malicious?


I don't see any comparison at all between intentionally starting a fire and your car exhaust unintentionally starting a fire.


I think there are a few examples where the bitrate is higher than a native rip however.


yes, but in very low amounts. Usually less than what a non-alcoholic beer would have.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: