Beautiful? That's a stretch, typical. I'd say.

However, it does work nicely. OP flexed the wrong quality

Of all the sites to copy...

this one may be the best?

i mean, if ur a fan of rachet design, sure

you built a website using another human's name, and then made a terrible wiki that doesnt even cover the subject matter well

i think this should be the most important subject on the site

https://andrej-karpathy.com/#/concepts/llm-wiki.md

and im pretty sure my partner knows more about llmwikis listening to me babble about them more than she would learn on these pages

the top nav is abysmal the cognee graph is useleess

''' Extracted Claims A useful LLM knowledge base can be maintained as a persistent markdown wiki. Raw sources, generated wiki pages, and schema/instructions should be separate layers. Ingest, query, and lint are the core operations. Query outputs can be filed back into the wiki when they contain reusable synthesis. Index and log files help both humans and agents navigate the evolving wiki. ''' this sis the most cogent thought on the subject and its on a stub

https://andrej-karpathy.com/#/source-notes/llm-wiki-gist.md

wow. termerity has a website

Don't forget milla jovovich.

Pro $16 per month, $190 billed yearly For solo builders repeatedly choosing what to build on. / 100 searches per month / Account-level monthly quota / Multiple API keys share the same quota / Hard caps, no surprise overages / API and CLI access

100 searches for 16/month? lol

not bad at all

i liked linq until i found out its business only, theres a steep setup fee and like a minimum 250 a month

it worked great, i had it hooked up to a few dofferent claws, but one the trial ran out and i went to subscribe i found out its not for personal use

i didn't find much use in Amp. pi extensions work well for me

zmux.

Thank you for using codeburg

collision with the strudel music project might suck

Thanks for the info I wasn’t aware of that one. Will rename it :D

Renamed it to saft