Unfortunate, but then the question becomes, is a slightly different version of RHEL really needed ? It would make sense for everyone in the RH v/s everyone camp to band together and do one distro instead of everyone creating slightly different versions of RHEL.
And they are stopping this now. That is the question.
Not "why do you need a RHEL copy?" (which you could have asked a year ago) but "why do you need a RHEL mostly but not quite copy?"
Right, and surely there's strictly more value in having a slightly different copy of RHEL than an identical copy of Rocky etc, since now there are strictly more use cases that are being addressed?