I'm not refuting its truth I'm refuting its relevance to the rest of the point. I'm a pretty sympathetic audience to criticisms of our food system and where it's taking us. But what you eat doesn't have much necessary connection to whether you participate in consumer culture.
They could have replaced "soy/insect" with "tendies" for the same rhetorical effect but appealing to a different crowd. That makes me interpret their choice as an intentional signal to a specific audience, rather than a functional part of their position.
They could have replaced "soy/insect" with "tendies" for the same rhetorical effect but appealing to a different crowd. That makes me interpret their choice as an intentional signal to a specific audience, rather than a functional part of their position.