I’ve read it and the author doesn’t address them. Unless they have access to additional data, such as their claims about the standard errors in Table 5 (only the Finals result has large enough errors to possibly discount). The original paper is pretty clear.
There are multiple critical reviews of this paper. It is well-known to be largely nonsense.
http://www.jsmp.dk/posts/2019-05-12-blindauditions/blindaudi...