Sure, it's better for governments to provide the incentives. Regarding your seco... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

rkomorn 10 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: If you're remote, ramble

Sure, it's better for governments to provide the incentives.

Regarding your second point, I guess you're right. :) I'm just looking at it from my "you couldn't even pay me to have a child" perspective.

Your question about making it a negative case is an interesting can of worms I'll elect not to open.

bee_rider 10 months ago [–]

I don’t think it is a can of worms really; making special negative cases for subsets of the population is a can of poop! There’s nothing so complicated as a worm in there.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact