Only because it's not yet attached to a reasonable AI, which is my point. It's not going to do any heavy lifting, but it could easily do basic house chores like cleaning up, folding laundry, etc if it were. The actuators and body platform are there, and economies of scale already at work.
I guess some folks just can't or won't put 2 and 2 together to predict the near future.
Your reasonable AI cannot resolve the fact that its arm can only lift 2KG.
I am impressed by Unitree, but the problem that needs to be solved here is not just better software. Better hardware needs to come down in cost and weight to make the generalized robot argument more convincing.
There is still a long way to go for a humanoid to be a reasonable product, and that's not just a software issue.
That covers more than 90% of the objects in my home, and most people's.
> the problem that needs to be solved here is not just better software. Better hardware needs to come down in cost and weight
I disagree. Software seems to be the main limitation to me at the moment. Bigger motors and batteries are readily available on the market already. Software is advancing rapidly, and seems to me will quickly be up to the task (i.e. within a few years), but at the moment is still the domain of research projects.
> There is still a long way to go for a humanoid to be a reasonable product
Whether or not you think it's a reasonable product, it's clearly already an available one which is already selling in volume. As with all things, future versions will be more capable.
Only because it's not yet attached to a reasonable AI, which is my point. It's not going to do any heavy lifting, but it could easily do basic house chores like cleaning up, folding laundry, etc if it were. The actuators and body platform are there, and economies of scale already at work.
I guess some folks just can't or won't put 2 and 2 together to predict the near future.