> Would not a better way to do this be to take the spammer's approach
On the other hand, anti-spam has gotten very good at distinguishing wanted and unwanted content.
If Google can do a reasonable job binning email spam, we must assume the NSA can do a reasonable job ignoring even relatively sophisticated keyword spamming.
> If Google can do a reasonable job binning email spam, we must assume the NSA can do a reasonable job ignoring even relatively sophisticated keyword spamming.
Indeed; however the recent Snowden leaks have given us a replacement - we know that the NSA stores indefinitely any encrypted messages. So, simply include inline a random message. Boom, you've permanently used up that much of their space for nothing.
On the other hand, anti-spam has gotten very good at distinguishing wanted and unwanted content.
If Google can do a reasonable job binning email spam, we must assume the NSA can do a reasonable job ignoring even relatively sophisticated keyword spamming.